Litesum

Image enlargement, 2×, 4× or any size

Make small images bigger, sharper and clearer.

Litesum Enhance enlarges photographs, artwork and screenshots by 2×, 4× or any size you ask for, on your own computer. It chooses among a faithful classical method and three AI networks by measurement, checks every result region by region against a faithful resize, and tells you how much the AI actually contributed.

In developmentIn development. Version 0.4.0 is in the signed catalogue, with the fidelity-trained 4× model inside its installer; not code-signed, one more blind review to come.In development · Windows first · No release date promised
The Litesum Enhance window enlarging a snowy street 2×: settings on the left with Compressed Image chosen automatically, the split view in the centre showing the original on the left of the divider and the result on the right, and the batch queue on the right.
A snowy street enlarged 2× on the faithful classical path, with the compression repair chosen automatically. Captured from the installed build; the status bar is cropped away and nothing else is touched up.

What it can do today

Built and reachable in the current build.

A count of what exists, not a judgement of quality. Confirmed by the Enhance team on 2026-09-18.

  • Any output size, reduction included

    Enlarge 2× or 4×, or ask for an exact width, an exact height, or any percentage from 1% to 400% — including making a picture smaller with the corrections still applied.

  • Chosen by measurement, checked against a faithful resize

    Seven image types, each on the method the benchmark shows wins for it. Every result is checked region by region, and Enhance tells you how much the AI actually contributed.

  • Protect anything the AI spoiled

    Paint over a mole, a sign or skin texture and that area stays exactly as your original, while the rest keeps the improvement.

  • Crop to what the picture is actually of

    Free, or six fixed shapes. Never written to your original, and your painted areas survive it.

  • Save the edit and come back to it

    Settings, crop, orientation, face choices and protected areas in one small file. Saving an edit and exporting an image are two separate commands.

  • Nothing leaves your computer

    Enhancement never uses the internet. The privacy audit that proves it runs on every build: 196 samples, zero connections.

Results

See what enlargement actually costs you.

Drag the divider, use the arrow keys, or jump to either side. Every comparison here says plainly what it is — and this one is still a placeholder, not output from Litesum Enhance.

A resolution test chart with radial spokes, concentric rings, a line wedge, colour swatches and text at several sizes. On the left the chart has been enlarged from a small compressed file and is soft and blocky; on the right it is at full size and sharp.
Small sourceFull size
Small source
320 × 240, enlarged 4×
Full size
1280 × 960
Scale
Mode
Placeholder

Placeholder. The left image is a 320 × 240 compressed file enlarged four times with ordinary bicubic resampling. The right image is the full-size original chart. Neither side has been processed by Litesum Enhance — this shows the problem Enhance is being built to solve, not its output. Genuine prototype results will replace this comparison.

The part nobody explains

Fifteen out of every sixteen pixels were never in your file.

Make an image four times larger and only one pixel in sixteen came from your original. The rest have to come from somewhere. A plain resize averages the neighbours, which is safe and soft. A trained network produces what such a picture usually looks like at that size.

That is the whole trade. The AI result is often much better. It is also, always, an informed guess.

Reconstructed detail is plausible, not recovered. It may not match what was in front of the camera. Do not rely on it to identify a person, read a number plate, or settle a question of fact.

From your fileReconstructed

One pixel in sixteen, at 4×.

Method per image

The right engine for the picture in front of it.

Seven image types, named for the kind of picture rather than the machinery behind it. Enhance chooses the type from the properties of the image and gives one plain reason for its choice. Every value can be overridden.

Faithful photographic

4 of 7

At 2×, a faithful classical enlargement. At 4×, Litesum's own network trained purely to be faithful — it beat the classical method on all twelve benchmark photographs. Neither invents detail that was never there.

  • General Photo

    Everyday photographs — camera, phone, landscapes, objects, animals.

  • High Quality Photo

    Images that already hold detail: cropped photographs, print enlargement. The most restrained option.

  • Low Resolution

    Small web images, heavily reduced images and old digital photographs. The most assertive of the photographic profiles.

  • Compressed Image

    JPEGs damaged by heavy compression — social-media downloads, block boundaries, mosquito noise.

Illustration AI network

2 of 7

A trained network, used where the benchmark shows it clearly beating a conventional resize.

  • Illustration and CGI

    Digital paintings, anime, drawings, rendered imagery, game assets and flat-colour artwork.

  • Text and Graphics

    Logos, screenshots, interface elements, diagrams, posters — anything with typography.

Generative AI · opt-in

1 of 7

Invents plausible texture rather than reconstructing measured detail. Never selected for you.

  • Generative Photo

    The generative photographic network, as an explicit choice. A Detail synthesis slider sets how much invention to keep — at zero no AI runs at all.

Measured, not claimed

Where it wins, and where it does not.

Every enlargement product says it is better. Here are the numbers, including the ones that do not flatter us.

A conventional enlargement beat every pretrained AI model on eleven of twelve real photographs — then Litesum's own network beat the conventional method on all twelve

Tested on skin, fur, snow, sky and old film scans, by both standard fidelity measures. Pretrained AI models tend to reinterpret fine, chaotic texture — grain, stubble, fur — where the measurement says that texture was real detail. So the conventional method became the photographic default.

Then we trained our own photographic network purely to be faithful to the original, with nothing in its training that rewards invented texture. On the same twelve photographs it beat the conventional method on all twelve, by both measures. So at 4× it is now the default, moved by the same rule that made the classical method the default before it, and every result is still checked region by region against a faithful resize.

At 2× photographs keep the conventional method: no 2× network has been trained or measured, and defaults follow measurements.

Where the AI clearly wins

Structural similarity against the known-correct answer. Higher is better.
SubjectLitesumConventional
Diagonal lines and line artDiagonals stay continuous instead of turning into staircases.0.930.79
Lettering and logosLetter edges stay crisp and the shapes are not altered.0.950.86
Architecture and hard edges0.950.88
Pixels overshooting on line artMeasured against a sharpened conventional resize. It is reconstructing edges rather than raising contrast around them.0.2%7%

Where it is no better, and we would rather say so

  • Dense foliage and fur

    Leaves and strands can merge into clumps. Both approaches lose the finest detail, and by one common measure the AI moves further from the true answer while looking better by another.

  • Smooth gradients and clear skies

    The model adds a faint texture that should not be there, so these areas are handed back to a conventional resize entirely — which means the AI contributes nothing there.

  • Interface screenshots with hairline rules

    One-pixel lines that have been reduced are difficult for anything to bring back.

About these numbers. These figures come from ten scenes drawn in code, not photographs. That was chosen so there is a known-correct answer to measure against, which no collected photograph can give — but it means they say nothing about sensor noise, lens character or real skin. Adding real photographs is on the list.

Hard limits

Output size
Original size, 2×, 4×, an exact width or height, or any percentage from 1% to 400% — reduction included. 3× and 6× as trained model scales, target megapixels and PPI are planned, not present.
Operating system
Windows only. macOS and Linux builds compile but have never been run.
Colour depth
8 bits per channel. 16-bit files open, but the depth is reduced.
Formats
JPEG, PNG, WebP and TIFF. No HEIC, AVIF, BMP or camera RAW yet.
Faces
Face recovery applies to small, soft faces only, and some of a rebuilt face is the model's work rather than your photograph's. Tested on 32 photographs of people, not a large or representative set.
Blur
No deblurring. Severe motion blur or focus error cannot be repaired.
Maximum output
32,768 pixels on a side and 500 megapixels, and never more memory than you have free.

Local first

Your images stay on your computer.

This is not a policy we intend to follow — it is how the software is built. There is no code in the enhancement path that can open a network connection.

The installed application was driven through a complete workflow — opening a JPEG, enhancing it 4×, exporting it — while every network socket it held was sampled four times a second. The result: 196 samples, 0 connections. Signing in and repairing a damaged model file are the only things that use the internet, and neither involves image data.

Socket samples
196
Connections opened
0
  • Your images are not used to train anything

    They cannot be. They never leave your computer.

  • No telemetry, analytics or usage reporting

    An automated audit fails the build if anyone adds any of it.

  • Original files are never modified

    Enhance writes a new file and leaves the source exactly as it was.

  • These are development requirements for the product, not just a statement on a web page.

Before release

What still stands between this build and a release.

Enhance has a scored release checklist, four blind independent reviews, a reproducible benchmark and a privacy audit, all kept with the source code. The checklist currently says it is not ready for release and lists why.

Code signing
Needs a purchased certificate.
Documentation read by someone else
Needs a reader who is not its author.
A sixth blind review
No reviewer has yet looked at the fidelity-trained model's output.

Files

What it opens and what it saves.

The export format follows the file name you choose. Every result is a new file; the original is never modified. 8 bits per channel throughout (16-bit files open, the depth is reduced); up to 32,768 pixels a side and 500 megapixels. No HEIC, AVIF, BMP or camera RAW yet.
FormatOpensSavesNotes
JPEGYesYesLossy; the quality slider controls how much is discarded. No transparency — transparent areas become white.
PNGYesYesLossless, with transparency.
WebPYesYesLossless at quality 100.
TIFFYesYesLossless.

Requirements

What you need to run it.

Operating system
Windows 10 version 1809 or later, or Windows 11. 64-bit.
Disk space
1 GB for the application, plus room for the images you make. A 4× enlargement of a 12-megapixel photograph is around 200 MB as a PNG.
Memory
8 GB is enough for 2× work and for 4× on smaller images. 16 GB if you enlarge full-size camera files by 4×. It measures the memory you actually have free and tells you before it starts a job it cannot finish.
Graphics
Any DirectX 12 graphics card — NVIDIA, AMD or Intel. Without one it falls back to the processor, which works but is roughly twenty times slower.
Internet
For the download and to sign in. Not for enhancing images.
Installer
One file of about 790 MB containing the application, the AI models, the graphics runtime and the .NET runtime. The two face-recovery models are around 450 MB of it. Nothing is downloaded afterwards.
Other platforms
macOS and Linux builds are produced but have never been run on real hardware. They are not supported yet and are not offered.

Not yet supported

What it does not do, in the team’s own words.

This list is as load-bearing as the capability list. Each item is a recorded decision or a known gap, and the page must not imply otherwise.

Faces and identification
Reconstructed detail is plausible, not recovered. Face recovery applies to small, soft faces only, has been tested on 32 photographs of people, and must never be used to identify anyone.
Other scales and straightening
3× and 6× as trained model scales, a target megapixel count and PPI are planned. Straightening by angle, custom aspect ratios and any generative fill or extension are not here.
A 2× photographic network
Photographs at 2× use the faithful classical method because no 2× network has been measured yet.
Video
Still images only.
macOS and Linux
Builds compile but have never been run on real hardware, so neither is offered.

Membership

Litesum Enhance is included in Litesum Complete.

Planned at £9.99 per month for every released Litesum application — 6 are being built to launch together — on 2 computers, cancellable from your account page. Everything you open, edit or export stays on your own computer — never uploaded, never used for training, never held behind a subscription.

Notify me at launchAbout membership

In development · Windows first · No release date promised

Questions

About Enhance.

Is this an AI upscaler?

Where measurement says it should be. Illustration, artwork, logos and screenshots run an AI network, because the benchmark shows it clearly beating a conventional enlargement there. Photographs at 4× run Litesum's own network trained purely to be faithful — it beat the conventional method on all twelve benchmark photographs. Photographs at 2× use a faithful classical method, because no 2× network has been measured yet. And a generative network that invents texture is available as Generative Photo, clearly labelled, never chosen for you.

So am I paying for AI I do not get?

You are paying for the better result and for being told which method produced it. Enhance checks every enlargement against a faithful resize region by region, and when the AI has not improved on it, it says so rather than letting you assume otherwise.

Will my images be uploaded?

No. Enhancement runs on your own machine. The installed application was driven through a full workflow while every network socket it held was sampled four times a second — 196 samples, zero connections — and an automated audit fails the build if anyone adds telemetry, a crash reporter or a network call to the enhancement path.

Will it overwrite my original images?

No. Every result is written as a new file. Your original is never modified.

Can it recover detail well enough to identify someone?

No, and you should not use it for that. Reconstructed detail is plausible, not recovered — it may not match what was in front of the camera. Face recovery rebuilds small, soft faces, and some of the result is the model's work rather than your photograph's; it has been tested on 32 photographs of people, not a large set.

Which operating systems will be supported?

Windows first. The macOS and Linux builds compile but have never been run, so neither is promised.

Taken from the Litesum Enhance repository's user documentation and release checklist as synced 18 September 2026, with the version and installer figures confirmed by the Enhance team the same day.